As I visit with people who work for different businesses, I hear about their efforts to improve the level of employee engagement. The common element of all these conversations is that these people are only trying to improve the level of engagement by a few percentage points instead of aiming for full (100%) employee engagement. With the global level of employee engagement hovering around 30 percent, a few percentage points of improvement really isn’t anything to write home about. What businesses need to do is start swing for the fences when it comes to improving the level of employee engagement and make full employee engagement their goal. The first step in doing this is to read a copy of my new book, The Engagement Formula which presents a new leadership model that guarantees full (100%) employee engagement. The truth of the matter is that it actually takes less effort to achieve full employee engagement than it does to raise the level of engagement by a few percentage points. For more info, go to: www.rossreck.com
The experts are very good at two things when comes to employee engagement: talking about it and and measuring it. What they can’t do is tell you how to make it happen in your company or organization. This is why the global level of employee engagement has hovered around 30 percent during the last several years and is not improving. My latest book, The Engagement Formula, contains a new leadership model that guarantees full (100%) employee engagement. If you’re interested in learning about it, here’s the link: http://rossreck.com/
This very powerful story was sent to my by a friend of mine and I’d like to share it with you.
“The last company I worked for was strong for the first few years and then started declining once we took on investor money and got away from our core values. At one point, the founder (no longer the CEO at this point) sent me 2 graphs. One was titled “Revenue”, and the other did not have a title. The 2 charts were very similar. They had spikes around the same times and dips around the same times. He asked me what I thought the second graph was, and I could not figure it out for the life of me. Finally, he told me that the second chart was the number of posts on the ‘iRock Board.’ The iRock Board was a little module that I added to our in-house software that allowed employees to post messages about coworkers that went above and beyond. The 2 graphs showed that when our employees were posting lots of compliments, revenue went up. When the iRock posts started to decline, so did our revenue.
Kind-of makes you think… :-).”
Albert Einstein once said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Business have been managing their employees the same way for more than a half century and the level of employee engagement is still only 23 to 31 percent. Clearly, change is needed before the level of employee engagement can significantly improve. The Engagement Formula, which I recently discovered, is the key to making the necessary change happen. This formula contains three simple steps that guarantee full (100 percent) employee engagement. Think of what it would mean to the success of any business if all its employees were working at their full potential. If you’re interesting in learning more, here’s the link: http://rossreck.com/
Employee engagement is extremely to the success of a business because it’s the primary driver of its financial performance. At the same time, research by Towers Perrin and BlessingWhite point out that only 21 to 31percent of the global workforce is engaged with their work. Clearly, something is very wrong with the way businesses deal with their employees or the level of employee engagement would be much closer to 100 percent than it is.
My recent book, The Engagement Formula presents a completely new methodology for working with employees that guarantees full employee engagement. If a business organization follows this formula, 100 percent of its employees will become engaged with their work—all working at their full potential. Think of what it would mean to the success of any organization—profit or non-profit—if it could get all of its employees engaged with their work. If you’re interested in looking at it, here’s the link: http://rossreck.com/
BlessingWhite, in their 2011 Employee Engagement Report,listed a finding that was particularly intriguing: engaged employees plan to stay at their current organizations because of what they can give. Disengaged employees, on the other hand, stay because of what they can get. This says very clearly that employee engagement is not just about money. It’s more about being able to make a valued contribution to something that matters.
Recent studies by major HR consulting firms have shown that the level of employee engagement is somewhere around 30 percent and it hasn’t improved in recent years. The reason that is hasn’t improved is that the overwhelming majority of businesses insist on using a management model that actually prevents employees from becoming engaged with their work. It’s often referred to a Management by the Numbers or Management by Command and Control. As Douglas McGregor, author of The Human Side of Enterprise, put it more than a half-century ago, the implicit logic to this method is “…that in order to get people to direct their efforts toward organizational objectives, management must tell them what to do, judge how well they have done, and reward or punish them accordingly.” The problem with this method is that it turns employees off–they strongly resent being told what to do, how to do it and then being judged by how well they did it by a boss or manager. When employees are turned off, they cannot become engaged with their work. This is why Management by the Numbers prevents people from becoming engaged.
As Einstein once said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” Continuing to use a management model that turns employees off is not going to improve the level of employee engagement. As McGregor put it, “The real need is for new theory, changed assumptions, (and) more understanding of the nature of human behavior in organizational settings.”
My new book, The Engagement Formula, presents a leadership model that incorporates new theory, changed assumptions and more understanding of the nature of human behavior in organizational settings. The model consists of three simple steps that guarantee full (100 percent) employee engagement. http://rossreck.com/
It seems like every time the business media features a company with high level of employee engagement, it refers to the company’s methodology for dealing with its employees as being new and innovative. In reality, all companies with a high level of employee engagement do the same basic things: They hire qualified people who mesh tightly with the company’s culture, they pay them well, treat them well and then get out of their way and let them do their job. In return for this special treatment, employees keep their company ahead of the curve when it comes to innovation and they see to it that the company’s customers are never disappointed. This results in higher levels of repeat and referral business which translates into significant increases in market share. This is pretty simple stuff when you think about it; not rocket science.
My new book, The Engagement Formula, provides a common sense blueprint that guarantees full employee engagement. If a business organization follows this blueprint, 100 percent of its employee will become engaged with their work–all working at their full potential. Think of what this could mean to the success of any business–profit or non-profit. For more information, please click on the following link: http://rossreck.com/
Many business leaders today want to have it both ways: On one hand they want loyal hard working employees who are willing to do whatever it takes to make the business successful and, on the other hand, they want to pay them the least amount possible. The problem with this is that paying low wages creates distractions for employees which means they cannot give their full attention and effort to performing their jobs. For example, if employees aren’t making enough money to support themselves, they will worry and fret over how they’re going to make ends meet which means they can’t give their full attention to performing their job. This is why companies with a high level of employee engagement such as SAS, JetBlue, Google, NetApp and Southwest Airlines make it a point to provide their employees with compensation that is at or above their industry average and a benefit package that’s fairly generous. They want to minimize these distractions so employees can focus on performing their jobs. As stated on the SAS web site, “They (employees) should be freed from many of the distractions of day-to-day life, so they can focus on doing their best work.” Similarly, Eric Schmidt, Executive Vice Chairman of Google had this to say when discussing Google’s philosophy regarding employee benefits. “The goal is to strip away everything that gets in our employees’ way (of doing their best work).”
My new book, The Engagement Formula, details the role that equitable pay plays in achieving full employee engagement. For more information, please click on the following link: http://rossreck.com/
The reason companies with high levels of employee engagement enjoy superior financial performance is they treat their employees in ways which bring out their best at work.
Their engaged employees, in turn, respond by creating a competitive edge for their company that can’t be easily copied—they’re constantly making innovative improvements to products, services and customer experiences while providing superior levels of customer service which results in loyal customers.
This means higher levels of repeat and referral business which, in turn, translates into significant increases in market share. In addition, companies with high levels of employee engagement enjoy substantial cost savings due to reduced employee turnover, absenteeism, accidents and employee theft.